Jeffrey Ayer
Partner
Antitrust & Competition
Jeff is a partner in the Washington, D.C., office of Kirkland & Ellis LLP. Jeff’s practice focuses on a wide range of antitrust matters, including securing antitrust clearance for complex transactions, antitrust litigation, antitrust counseling and government investigations.
Jeff has obtained antitrust clearance for numerous transactions, litigated cases in state and federal court, and represented clients in civil investigations before the U.S. antitrust agencies. His practice includes counseling on proposed transactions and joint ventures, distribution practices and Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) filing requirements.
With many transactions triggering both U.S. and foreign filings, Jeff has worked closely with local counsel in securing clearance in jurisdictions worldwide. He has also represented clients before the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Communications Commission in merger reviews and investigations of alleged anticompetitive conduct.
Since joining Kirkland, Jeff's representative matters have included:
Prior to joining Kirkland, Jeff’s representative matters included:
Regal Entertainment Group in state and federal antitrust litigation brought by competing theatre owners.
U.S. antitrust clearance for the combination of the two largest Bible publishers in the United States.
Qwest in its merger with CenturyLink.
Mayne Pharma Ltd. in its acquisition by Hospira Inc.
Regal Entertainment in several transactions in the movie theater industry, including Regal's merger with United Artists Theatre Company, and its acquisitions of Edwards Theatres, Signature Theatres, Eastern Federal Theatres, and Consolidated Theatres.
As part of the district court and appellate litigation teams in United States v. LSL Biotechnologies, Inc., Jeff helped convince the district court to dismiss, and the appellate court to affirm the dismissal of, the government's case on the grounds that U.S. courts lacked jurisdiction under the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act.
Represented a client before the Antitrust Division in a market allocation investigation that had been handled by another firm for three years, helping to persuade the Antitrust Division in less than six months to close its investigation with no enforcement action.
Managing Editor, Arizona Law Review